Wow. This blog is increasingly difficult to log
into. Just navigating through the
security system is wearying. The
password has changed. Looks like another
blog name as well. I hope I post this to
the correct blog.
My
intent for this post was to agree with the previous post. However, that post was Sunday night. There have been two subsequent posts. Obviously the blogging here is continuing at
a frenetic pace.
After
hearing a verbal summary from the Publisher regarding her thoughts on “love at
first sight” I thought it might be appropriate for me to send a brief note of support. Rather than just highlighting occasional
differences, it may be wise to also make clear that we agree on certain
issues. After all, our relationship is
based on more than just strategic tension.
In
response to the Publisher’s 9/22/13 invitation, my (brief) story follows:
First,
I am happy to say I agree with the Publisher on her “love at first sight”
analysis. I appreciate her unsolicited recorded
statements regarding my intelligence. I
regret that my appearance is incongruent with her vision of the ideal man. Nonetheless, I can sympathize somewhat.
Back
in the day, when I was single, I figured that there was a good chance I would
remain single, with only modest potential for marriage. I did, however, have a vision of the ideal
woman.
She
was to be a raven-haired Cuban spy that was partially disillusioned with a
system she once fully supported. I would
likely meet her in South Beach or Nassau.
Through the passage of time, she would continue to gradually change to
see things from my point of view.
Even
then, I realized that there was a low probability that this plan would come to
fruition. So I formulated a back-up
plan.
Plan
B entailed a blonde East German spy that I would meet in Zurich. This plan was dashed with the dissolution of
the Stasi and the re-unification of Germany.
More
importantly, Plan A and Plan B vanished when I observed the Publisher combing
her hair by the edge of the river on the third day of the raft trip. While it may not have been “love at first
sight” I can say at that point there was a real live female on the radar
screen. In retrospect, I admit that this
real life situation with a home grown defender of the status quo proceeded to a
more stable long-term relationship than would my hypothetical unfulfilled plans
with fictitious women.
Approximately
6,900 days removed from Stillwater, MN (marriage location) or 7,400 days
removed from Venezuela (Publisher’s reported date of emotional connection) or
7,050 days removed from Forest City, IA (Chairman’s date of permanent emotional
connection excluding that 24-hour period one day before our engagement), we can
conclude that, for our family anyway, lasting love occurs after several
repeated sightings.
Finally,
the foreign espionage agents would not likely have been willing to stack
firewood the other day or prepare a meal with fresh organic produce. Thanks Publisher!
based on more than strategic tension. i flat out simply adore that statement. and am going to have my hubby read this post. and i need to catch up on previous posts so i know what in the world is being heretofore referred to..must have been a doozy. i'm so glad you ended up with a clear thinking non mean looking German blonde. I mean..what were you thinking? hee heeeeeee ( thanks for posting this to fb so I could run over and read this..now you'll just have to join facebook , Mr. Chairman , so you really know what is being said about you)
ReplyDeleteoops missed a word.."based on more than JUST strategic tension.."
ReplyDeleteoops...or are you Norwegian, dear Chairman's wife??
ReplyDeleteGeneral agreement is a beautiful thing, always nice to hear from the Chairman himself at times!
ReplyDeleteLOL and enjoying every minute of reading this. You are too funny, both of you!! So glad you are both in my friendship chain. :D
ReplyDeleteWhat a great read! Smiling through it all, and glad you found each other!
ReplyDelete